S0818 The Rules of Argumentation
This course covers the three topics.
\r\n\r\n
The first topic will begin with lectures covering basic models of argumentation, particularly a modification of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. We will look at the elements of reasoning such as data, evidence, claims and conclusions, focusing special attention on hidden assumptions called warrants in argumentation. This model of argumentation is applicable to daily casual discussion as well as scientific argumentation. Following these lectures, students will be asked to analyze the structure of argumentation of written material, reconstruct the argument then present the results of their analysis. In addition, students will discuss current issues based on the rules of argument. The skills acquired here are the basis for discussion and argumentation in this course as well as applicable to other courses that students are taking.
\r\n\r\n
The second topic will cover rhetorical approaches  to argumentation in contrast to the rules of argumentation. Here we  define rhetoric as kinds of thinking skills. We will collect various  examples of kinds of thinking from a variety of materials ranging from  newspapers to literary works, then categorize and analyze these  materials. In short, we will explore the possibility of thought through  massive accumulation of concrete examples of different ways of human  thinking. Students will be required to come up with their own personal  collection of examples of argumentation based on a certain  categorization to present in class. 
 The third topic will be the fallibility of human  reasoning in daily life. We often make conclusions based on intuition  and faulty logic. For example, we tend to misinterpret random data and  try to read something meaningful out of nothing, to generalize something  based on little evidence and to see what we expect to see. The reasons  behind these behaviors come partially from the nature of human cognition  and partially from social support mechanisms. Following lectures,  students will explore examples of such fallacies in their own and other  cultures. 
 This last topic deals with critical thinking in connection with what we  can do to improve everyday reasoning. The underlying causes of faulty  reasoning and erroneous beliefs will never be eliminated due to our  natural cognitive style. We tend to prefer holding simplified beliefs  with confidence. However, this topic does suggest strategies for  minimizing these tendencies through critical thinking. 
 
 Lectures will be given but major emphasis will be  placed upon discussion, research and class presentation. Necessary  readings will be on reserve in the library. Along with lectures on each  topic, the students will be required to do a small research project and  present the results of their research in class for discussion. The  midterm and final exams will be take-home exams. 
 No preliminary knowledge is required
Readings
Evaluation



