Week 1
Orientation week
Week 2
1. Introduction and overview: Macro and micro process and outcome methods for global governance and conflict resolution.
- Dingwerth, K. & Pattberg, P. 2006. Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12: 185-203.
- Slocum-Bradley, N. & Bradley, A. 2010. Is the EU’s governance good? An assessment of EU governance in its partnership with ACP states. Institute for European Studies: Working Paper 1-2010: 1-31.
Weeks 3
2. Historical perspectives-visions of global governance for peace, security, cooperation, and development.
- Case: UN and/or Bretton Woods Institutions (WB, IMF)
- Jolly, R. 2005. The UN and development thinking and practice. Forum for Development Studies. June: 49 – 73.
- Weiss, T. 2000. Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21: 795-814.
Weeks 4, 5
3. Obstacles to global governance, peace, security, cooperation, and development: micro individual, meso organizational, and macro institutional.
- Case: Nike, Pakistan, and Footballs
- Nadvi, K. 2008. Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 323-343.
- Case: The World Trade Organization and Global Environmental Governance
- Conca, K. 2000. The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance. Review of International Political Economy, 7: 484-494.
- Zurn, M. 2004. Global governance and legitimacy problems. Government and Opposition, 260-287.
- Rajagopal, B. 2014. Global governance: Old and new challenges. Realizing the Right To Development. 169-182.
- Woods, N. 2000. The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development, 28: 823-841.
- Nielsen, Ch. 2. “Obstacles.”
Weeks 6, 7
4. Vision and values based global governance leadership.
- Case: The Norwegian Sustainability and Ethical Investing Model
- Case: Novo Nordisk and The Triple-Bottom Line (Economic, Social, Environmental)
- Buchannan, A. & Keohane, R. 2006. The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics and International Affairs, 20: 405-437.
- Abbott, K.W. & Snidal, D. 1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42: 3-32.
- Teegen, H., Doh, J. & Vachani, S. 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463-483.
Weeks 8
Midterm break
Week 9
5. Incentive and networking based global governance leadership.
- Case: The World Bank and Conditionality
- Case: The Cities for Climate Protection Program
- Natsios, A. S. 1995. NGOs and the UN System in complex humanitarian emergencies: Conflict or cooperation? Third World Quarterly, 16: 405-419.
- Santiso, C. 2001. Good governance and aid effectiveness: The World Bank and conditionality. The Georgetown Public Policy Review, 1: 1-22.
- Betsill, M.M. & Bulkeley, H. 2004. Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program. International Studies Quarterly, 48: 471-493.
- Nielsen, R.P. “Varieties of Win-Win Solutions to Problems With Ethical Dimensions,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 88: 333-349.
- Nielsen, Ch. 5, “Win-Win Methods.”
Weeks 10, 11
6. Power based top-down compliance and bottom-up whistle-blowing global governance leadership.
- Case: World Bank and environmentally destructive lending practices.
- Case: Palm Oil, ISO, and Indonesia
- McCarthy, J. & Zen, Z. 2010. Regulating the oil palm boom: Assessing the effectiveness of environmental governance approaches to Agro-industrial pollution in Indonesia. Law and Policy, 32: 153 – 165.
- Krisch, N. & Kingsbury, B. 2006. Introduction: Global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order. The European Journal of International Law, 17: 1-13.
- Nielsen, R.P. 2013. “Whistle-Blowing Methods For Navigating Within And Sometimes Reforming Regulatory Institutions,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 112: 385-395.
- Nielsen, Ch. 4, “Win-lose forcing methods”
Week 12
7. Empowering, dialog, and critical intellectual based global governance leadership.
- Case: The IMF and Accountability
- Case: UN Conferences
- Hass, P. 2002. UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Global Governance, 8: 73-91.
- Woods, N. 2001. Making the IMF and the World Bank more accountable. International Affairs, 77: 83-100.
- Willetts, P. 2000. From consultative arrangements to partnership: The changing status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN. Global governance, 6: 191-212.
- Nanz, P. & Steffek, J. 2004. Global governance, participation and the public sphere. Government and Opposition, 314 – 336.
- Nielsen, Ch. 6, “Dialog methods.”
- Nielsen, Ch. 7, “Woolman’s Friendly disentangling.”
- Nielsen, Ch. 8, “Kierkegaard’s Friendly up-building.”
- Nielsen, Ch. 9, “Postmodern methods.”
Week 13
8. Alternative institution building, social entrepreneurship leadership for global governance.
- Nielsen, D. and Tierney, M. 2003. Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57: 241-276.
- Van Huijstee, M. & Glasbergen, P. 2010. NGOs moving business: An analysis of contrasting strategies. Business and Society, 49: 591-618.
- Teegen, H., Doh, J. & Vachani, S. 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463-483.
Week 14
9. Reflection and course summary
- Slocum-Bradley, N. & Bradley, A. 2010. Is the EU’s governance good? An assessment of EU governance in its partnership with ACP states. Institute for European Studies: Working Paper 1-2010: 1-31.
- Weiss, T. 2000. Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21: 795-814.
- Woods, N. 2000. The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development, 28: 823-841.
- Jolly, R. 2005. The UN and development thinking and practice. Forum for Development Studies. June: 49 – 73.
- Nielsen, Ch. 12, “Conclusion: Proteus as Institutional Citizen.”
Week 15
Exam week
All readings will be included within the VIU e-learning system.
- Krisch, N. & Kingsbury, B. 2006. Introduction: Global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order. The European Journal of International Law, 17: 1-13.
- Dingwerth, K. & Pattberg, P. 2006. Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12: 185-203.
- Weiss, T. 2000. Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21: 795-814.
- Abbott, K.W. & Snidal, D. 1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42: 3-32.
- Natsios, A. S. 1995. NGOs and the UN System in complex humanitarian emergencies: Conflict or cooperation? Third World Quarterly, 16: 405-419.
- Hass, P. 2002. UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Global Governance, 8: 73-91.
- Nadvi, K. 2008. Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 323-343.
- Woods, N. 2000. The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development, 28: 823-841.
- Willetts, P. 2000. From consultative arrangements to partnership: The changing status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN. Global governance, 6: 191-212.
- Nielsen, D. and Tierney, M. 2003. Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57: 241-276.
- Slocum-Bradley, N. & Bradley, A. 2010. Is the EU’s governance good? An assessment of EU governance in its partnership with ACP states. Institute for European Studies: Working Paper 1-2010: 1-31.
- Zurn, M. 2004. Global governance and legitimacy problems. Government and Opposition, 260-287.
- Rajagopal, B. 2014. Global governance: Old and new challenges. Realizing the Right To Development. 169-182.
- Nanz, P. & Steffek, J. 2004. Global governance, participation and the public sphere. Government and Opposition, 314 – 336.
- Santiso, C. 2001. Good governance and aid effectiveness: The World Bank and conditionality. The Georgetown Public Policy Review, 1: 1-22.
- Woods, N. 2001. Making the IMF and the World Bank more accountable. International Affairs, 77: 83-100.
- Teegen, H., Doh, J. & Vachani, S. 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463-483.
- Buchannan, A. & Keohane, R. 2006. The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics and International Affairs, 20: 405-437.
- Van Huijstee, M. & Glasbergen, P. 2010. NGOs moving business: An analysis of contrasting strategies. Business and Society, 49: 591-618.
- McCarthy, J. & Zen, Z. 2010. Regulating the oil palm boom: Assessing the effectiveness of environmental governance approaches to Agro-industrial pollution in Indonesia. Law and Policy, 32: 153 – 165.
- Conca, K. 2000. The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance. Review of International Political Economy, 7: 484-494.
- Nielsen, R.P. The Politics of Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nielsen, R.P. 2013. “Whistle-Blowing Methods For Navigating Within And Sometimes Reforming Regulatory Institutions,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 112: 385-395.
- Nielsen, R.P. “Varieties of Win-Win Solutions to Problems With Ethical Dimensions,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 88: 333-349.